Is There a Proper Way to Teach Design Thinking? Empirical Evidence from Design Thinking in Education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Business and Economics, Jacobs University, Berman, Germany and University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

2 Instructor, Institute for Strategy and Leadership, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

3 Associate Professor, Institute of Strategy and Management, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

4 Jacobs University, Berman, Germany

5 Instructor, Institute of Design, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo, Norway

6 Associate Professor, Institute of Design, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Since about a decade ago, design thinking has become a prominent topic in the scientific and business world. In order to keep up with global competition, design thinking has proven to be a valuable concept for assisting companies to innovate their products, services and processes. Therefore, business schools worldwide have introduced design thinking courses with the aim of preparing the future workforce. Scholars debate about the appropriate approach to teach design, with this paper trying to identify how a design thinking course should be arranged to teach non-designers the processes, methods and mindset of design thinking. It deals with the question of which form of knowledge conversion is more effective for bringing non-design students closer to the design thinking mindset. To answer this, it reviews current studies on design thinking in education. In particular, the research refers to Simon’s and Schön’s concepts of science of design and reflection-in-action, along with Nonaka and Takeushi’s SECI model. The research involves an experiment with two similar one-week design thinking courses, each having different teaching approaches. The courses are then compared through analysis of reflection reports by students, semi-structured interviews with them and a survey. This research shows that applying design thinking knowledge to real-life projects should be a core element in design thinking curricula, as it plays a crucial role in successfully imparting design thinking. Further, co-teaching and co-learning modes, where designers and non-designers work together and socialization takes place, is more appropriate for imparting design thinking than instructional teaching and learning modes, where design thinking coaches instruct non-designers to internalize design thinking.

Keywords

References

Adams, R. S., Daly, S. R., Mann, L. M., & Dall'Alba, G. (2011). Being a professional: Three lenses into
design thinking, acting and being. Design Studies, 32(6), p. 588–607.
Badke-Schaub, P., Roozenburg, N., & Cardoso, C. (2010). Design thinking: A paradigm on its way from
dilution to meaninglessness. In Proceedings of the 8th design thinking research symposium, p. 19–20.
Beltagui, A. (2018). A design-thinking perspective on capability development: The case of new product
development for a service business model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
38(4), p. 1041–1060.
Boland, R. J., & Collopy, F. (2004). Managing as designing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design Thinking as Mindset, Process and Toolbox, in:
Design Thinking for Innovation. Springer, Cham, p. 3–21.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), p.5–21.
Bucolo, S., & Matthews, J. H. (2010). Using a design led disruptive innovation approach to develop new
services: Practicing innovation in times of discontinuity. In Proceedings of the 11th International CINet
Conference: Practicing Innovation in the Times of Discontinuity, p. 176–187.
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2014). Design Thinking: Exploring values and effects from an
innovation capability perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), p. 403–423.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Conducting, Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative
Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning Professional Ways of Being: Ambiguities of Becoming. Educational
Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), p. 34–45.
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An
Interview and Discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), p. 512–523.
Eagen, W., Cukier, W., Bauer, R., & Ngwenyama, O. (2010). Design Thinking: Can creativity be taught.
In Proceedings from The Future of Education International Conference, Florence, Italy.
Elsbach, K. D., & Stigliani, I. (2018). Design thinking and organizational culture: A review and framework
for future research. Journal of Management, 44(6), p. 2274–2306.
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological and
ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), p. 5–17.
Gloppen, J. (2009). Perspectives on design leadership and design thinking and how they relate to European
service industries. Design Management Journal, 4(1), p. 33–47.
Heiman, B.A., & Burnett, W.B. (2010). The Role of Design Thinking in Firms and Management Education.
Stanford University.
Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science research in information systems. MIS
quarterly, 28(1), p. 75–105.
Kim, J., & Ryu, H. (2014). A design thinking rationality framework: Framing and solving design problems
in early concept generation. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(5-6), p. 516–553.
Kimbell, L. (2009). Design practices in design thinking. European Academy of Management, p. 1–24.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, N. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits of growth, a report
for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Potomac, London.
Melles, G., Howard, Z., & Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2012). Teaching Design Thinking: Expanding
Horizons in Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, p. 162–166.
Mosely, G., Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2018). Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design
expertise. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, p. 177–189.
Nessler, D. (2016). How to apply a design thinking, HCD, UX or any creative process from scratch?
https://medium.com/digital-experience-design/how-to-apply-a-design-thinking-hcd-ux-or-any-creativeprocess-from-scratch-b8786efbf812
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the
dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norman, J. (2001). Design as a framework for innovative thinking and learning: how can design thinking
reform education? Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards
Creative Confidence. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2010),
Kobe, Japan.
Redlich, B., & Lattemann, C. (2019). A Design Thinking Approach for Talent Management: Can Talent
Management benefit from Design Thinking? In: Liu, Y. (ed.). Research Handbook of International Talent
Management, Edward Elgar, forthcoming.
Rittel, H. W. (1972). On the Planning Crisis: Systems Analysis of the 'First and Second Generations',
Bedriftsokonomen, 8, p. 390–396.
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design
thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), p. 8–19.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple
Smith.
Schön, D. A. (1984). The Architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action.
Journal of Architectural Education, 38(1), p. 2–9.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge.
 
Journal of Design Thinking
Volume 1, Issue 1
June 2020
Pages 35-48

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics