Understanding Experiential Qualities of Light-Touch-Matters: Towards a Tool Kit

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Postdoc Fellow, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

3 Professor, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

Abstract

The present paper is about the tools and strategies, designers adopt and develop to support their understanding of an underdeveloped smart material composite. Referred to as Light-Touch-Matters or in short, the LTM materials, the composition is proposed by materials scientists, integrating the two smart materials of flexible thin-film Organic Light-Emitting Diodes and piezo-electric polymers. In a project funded by European-Union, materials scientists and designers joined forces to further develop such smart material composites through early design input. In order to introduce and represent the LTM materials to designer’s prior their actual development, materials scientists mainly used abstract descriptions, ‘key’ physical properties and sensing/actuating function. Such representations, however, hardly capture the experiential qualities of LTM materials, which concern how they gratify our senses and what meanings, emotions and actions they elicit. This paper has conducted four design case studies to identify the design approaches and representational tools used and developed by designers for understanding, exploration and communication of the experiential qualities of these underdeveloped smart materials. Discussing the limitations of the identified tools in terms of capturing the dynamic and performative qualities, the paper draws further implications towards a future design Tool Kit.

Keywords


Addington, M., & Schodek, D. (2005). Smart materials and technologies in architecture. London: Architectural Press.
Ashby, M. F., & Johnson, K. (2009). Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier, UK.
Barati, B., Karana, E., & Hekkert, P., and Jönsthövel, I. (2015). Designing with an underdeveloped computational composite for materials experience. In Proceedings of Tangible Means: Experiential Knowledge through Materials (EKSIG 2015), Kolding, Denmark.
Barati, B., Karana, E., & Hekkert, P. (2015). From way finding in the dark to interactive CPR trainer: designing with computational composites. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DesForm 2015), Milan, Italy.
Barati, B., Karana, E., Jansen, K.M.B., & Claus, S. (2019). Making a drop of light: an illustrative case of designing for electroluminescent material experiences. International Journal of Design Engineering, 8(2), p. 170 – 196. https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=100552
Ball, L. J., & Christensen, B. T. (2009). Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies, 30(2), p. 169-186.
Bergström, J., Clark, B., Frigo, A., Mazé, R., Redström, J., & Vallgårda, A. (2010). Becoming materials: material forms and forms of practiceDigital Creativity21(3), p. 155-172.
Bohnenberger, S. (2013). Material exploration and engagement: strategies for investigating how multifunctional materials can be used as design drivers in architecture (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Boujut, J. F., & Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12(2), p. 205-219.
Brownell, B. (2010). Transmaterial 3: a catalog of materials that redefine our physical environment. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000). Experience Prototyping. In proceeding of the 3rd conference on Design Interactive System: Processes, Practices, Methodes and Techniques (DIS ’00), p. 424-433. ACM.
Coelho, M. (2007). Programming the Material World. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp).
Davidson, E. J. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. Mis Quarterly, p. 329-358.
Davis, R., Shrobe, H., & Szolovits, P. (1993). What is a knowledge representation? AI magazine, 14(1), p. 17.
Denzin, N. K. (1973). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction publishers.
Döring, T., Sylvester, A., & Schmidt, A. (2012). Exploring material-centered design concepts for tangible interaction. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1523-1528. ACM.
Dow, S., Saponas, T. S., Li, Y., & Landay, J. A. (2006). External representations in ubiquitous computing design and the implications for design tools. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, p. 241-250. ACM.
Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2007). Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organization Studies, 28(5), p. 689-708.
Fernaeus, Y., & Sundström, P. (2012). The material move how materials matter in interaction design research. In proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference, p. 486-495. ACM.
Franinović, K., & Franzke, L. (2015). Luminous Matter Electroluminescent Paper as an Active Material. Design and semantics of form and movement, p. 37.
Giaccardi, E., & Karana, E. (2015). Foundations of materials experience: An approach for HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 2447-2456. ACM.
Hekkert, P., & Dijk, M. (2011). Vision in design: A guidebook for innovators. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, technology & human values, 16(4), p. 448-473.
Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., & Roussel, N. (2003). Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p. 17-24. ACM.
Jordana, A., Adriaenssensa, S., Kilianb, A., Adriaenssensc, M., & Freedc, Z. (2015). Material driven design for a chocolate pavilion, Computer-Aided Design 61, p. 2-12.
Jung, H., & Stolterman, E. (2012). Digital form and materiality: propositions for a new approach to interaction design research. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, p. 645-654. ACM.
Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2008). Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers. Materials & Design, 29(6), p.1081-1089.
Karana, E. (2009). Meanings of materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.
Karana, E., Pedgley, O., & Rognoli, V. (2014). Materials Experience: fundamentals of materials and design. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Karana, E., Barati, B., Rognoli, V., & Zeeuw Van der Laan, A. (2015). Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences. International journal of design, 19 (2).
Karana, E., Blauwhoff, D., Hultink, E. J., & Camera, S. (2018). When the material grows: A case study on designing (with) mycelium-based materials. International Journal of Design, 12, p. 119-136.
Katz, D. (1935). The world of color (R. B. MacLeod & C.W. Fox, Trans.). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner. (Original work published 1911)
Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. Ai & Society, 25(4), p. 441-454.
Lee, C. P. (2007). Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16(3), p.307-339.
Manenti S., (2011). Designing with Liquid wood: a problem of material identity. (Master’s thesis). School of Design, Politecnico di Milano.
McManus, H., & Hastings, D. (2005). A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty and its Mitigation and Exploitation in Complex Systems. INCOSE International Symposium, 15(1), p. 484-503.
Manzini, E. (1989). The material of invention: materials and design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Miodownik, M. A. (2007). Toward designing new sensoaesthetic materials. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 79(10), p. 1635-1641.
Miodownik, M., & Tempelman, E. (2014). Light Touch Matters. The Product is the interface. Retrieved
Nathan, A., Ahnood, A., Cole, M. T., Lee, S., Suzuki, Y., Hiralal, P. & Haque, S. (2012). Flexible electronics: the next ubiquitous platform. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), p. 1486-1517.
Neuwirth, C. M., & Kaufer, D. S. (1989). The role of external representation in the writing process: implications for the design of hypertext-based writing tools. In Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Hypertext, p. 319-341. ACM.
Newman, M. W., Lin, J., Hong, J. I., & Landay, J. A. (2003). DENIM: An informal web site design tool inspired by observations of practice. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3), p. 259-324.
Niedderer, K. (2012). Exploring elastic movement as a medium for complex emotional expression in silver design. International Journal of Design, 6(3).
Olberding, S., Wessely, M., & Steimle, J. (2014). PrintScreen: fabricating highly customizable thin-film touch-displays. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p. 281-290. ACM.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), p. 174-207.
Oxman, N. (2010). Material-based design computation (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Oxman, N., & Rosenberg, J. L. (2007). Material-based Design Computation an Inquiry into Digital Simulation of Physical Material Properties as Design Generators. International journal of architectural computing, 5(1), p. 25-44.
Redström, J. (2005). On technology as material in design. Design Philosophy Papers, 3(2), p. 39-54.
Rognoli, V. (2010). A broad survey on expressive-sensorial characterization of materials for design education. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 27(2), p. 287-300.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), p. 387-420.
Saakes, D., & Stappers, P. J. (2009). A tangible design tool for sketching materials in products. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23(03), p. 275-287.
Schön, D. (1991). The Reflective Practitioner. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Sundström, P., Taylor, A., Grufberg, K., Wirström, N., Solsona Belenguer, J., & Lundén, M. (2011). Inspirational bits: towards a shared understanding of the digital material. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1561-1570. ACM.
Vallgårda, A., & Redström, J. (2007). Computational composites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p. 513-522. ACM.
Vallgårda, A., & Sokoler, T. (2010). A material strategy: Exploring material properties of computers. International Journal of Design, 4(3), p. 1–14.
Van Kesteren, I. E. H. (2008). Selecting materials in product design. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology.
Verganti, R. (2009). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press.
Visser, W. (1995). Use of episodic knowledge and information in design problem solving. Design Studies, 16(2), p. 171-187.
Wastiels, L., Schifferstein, H. N., Heylighen, A., & Wouters, I. (2012). Relating material experience to technical parameters: A case study on visual and tactile warmth perception of indoor wall materials. Building and Environment,49, p. 359-367.
Wendrich, R. E. (2012). Multimodal interaction, collaboration, and synthesis in design and engineering processing. In DS 70: Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
Wiberg, M. (2014). Methodology for materiality: interaction design research through a material lens. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), p. 625-636.
Wiberg, M. (2016). Interaction, new materials & computing–Beyond the disappearing computer, towards material interactions. Materials & design, 90, p. 1200-1206.
Wiberg, M., & Robles, E. (2010). Computational compositions: Aesthetics, materials and interaction design. International Journal of Design, 4(2).
Wilkes, S., Wongsriruksa, S., Howes, P., Gamester, R., Witchel, H., Conreen, M., Laughlin, Z., & Miodownik, M. (2016). Design tools for interdisciplinary translation of material experiences. Materials & Design, 90, p. 1228-1237.
Yamamoto, Y., & Nakakoji, K. (2005). Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), p. 513-535.
Zuo, H. (2010). The selection of materials to match human sensory adaptation and aesthetic expectation in industrial design. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 27(2), p. 301-320.