A Design-Oriented Model of Permanent Residents’ Perceptions of Built-Environmental Impacts of Second-Home Development in Rural Contexts

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran

10.22059/jdt.2026.409456.1178

Abstract

The rapid growth of tourism-related second homes is a key driver of physical and environmental change in rural areas, reshaping settlements and the spatial experiences of permanent residents. While previous studies focus on land-use and socio-economic consequences, design-oriented implications across spatial scales have received limited attention. This gap hinders a nuanced understanding of how such developments are perceived by host communities, which is critical for mitigating visual disruption and fostering contextual design. Using a perception-based approach, this study develops a conceptual model to examine how permanent residents evaluate the physical and environmental impacts of second-home development. The model integrates four design-related components: formal aesthetics, symbolic aesthetics, landscape transformations at the macro scale, and physical changes in rural housing at the micro scale. Employing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected via a researcher-designed questionnaire in the villages of Heravi and Beyraq in Tabriz County. The proposed model was tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results indicate that perceived rural landscape-scale changes most strongly shape overall evaluations, while micro-scale house alterations show no significant direct effect. Formal aesthetic qualities significantly affect perceptions, unlike symbolic aesthetics. Residents’ responses are driven less by isolated architectural features than by broader changes in visual coherence, scale, and landscape continuity. This study contributes by reframing second-home development as a design-led problem and proposing a multi-scalar model where rural landscape structure centrally shapes environmental perceptions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002 
Antrop, M., & Van Eetvelde, V. (2017). Landscape perspectives: The holistic nature of landscape. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6
Daniel, T. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00141-4
Fathy, H. (1986). Natural energy and vernacular architecture: Principles and Examples with reference to hot arid climates (W. Shearer & A. A. Sultan, Eds.). University of Chicago Press.
Gallent, N., Mace, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2005). Second homes | European Perspectives and UK policies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315243580/second-homes-nick-gallent-alan-mace-tewdwr-jones
Gibson, James. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception (classic edition) (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315740218/ecological-approach-visual-perception-james-gibson
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology. 22: 959-972., 22. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/12551
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354331182_A_Primer_on_Partial_Least_Squares_Structural_Equation_Modeling_PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hall, C. M., & Müller, D. K. (2004). Tourism, mobility and second-homes: Between elite landscape and common ground. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292426206_Tourism_Mobility_and_Second-homes_Between_Elite_Landscape_and_Common_Ground
Hernández, B., Carmen Hidalgo, M., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
Herzog, T. R., & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery, and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916588203004
Hunziker, M., Buchecker, M., & Hartig, T. (2007). Space and place – two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. In A Changing World (pp.47-62). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4436-6_5
Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch. (2001). Tarhe Hadiye Roustaye Beyraq »Beyraq rural guide plan«. East Azerbaijan Province Housing Foundation of the Islamic Revolution.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective (pp. xii, 340). Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, S. (1996). Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Paperback. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316377870_The_Theoretical_Foundations_of_Evolutionary_Psychology
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
Lewicka, M. (2008). Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001
Lynnebakke, B., & Aasland, A. (2022). Striking roots: Place attachment of international migrants, internal migrants and local natives in three Norwegian rural municipalities. ResearchGate, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.021
Menatti, L., Subiza-Pérez, M., Villalpando-Flores, A., Vozmediano, L., & San Juan, C. (2019). Place attachment and identification as predictors of expected landscape restorativeness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.005
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000085
Moore. (2021). Planning for place: Place attachment and the founding of rural community land trusts. Journal of Rural Studies, 83(21–29). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.007
Müller, D. (2008). Second homes in the Nordic countries: Between common heritage and exclusive commodity. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263461636_Second_Homes_in_the_Nordic_Countries_Between_Common_Heritage_and_Exclusive_Commodity
Müller, D. (2011). Second homes in rural areas: Reflections on a troubled history. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 65(3). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00291951.2011.597872
Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior, 26(3), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600305
Naghsheh va Simaye Shahrestan Consulting Engineers. (2014). Baznegari Tarhe Hadiye Roustaye Heravi. »Revision of the Heravi rural guide plan«. East Azerbaijan Province Housing Foundation of the Islamic Revolution.
Ning, F., Wang, H., Chien, Y.-C., Pan, H., & Ou, S.-J. (2024). An investigation into the shifting landscape preferences of rural residents in Taiwan and their relationship with ecological indicators. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 27893. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77045-x
Ode Sang, A., Sundli Tveit, M., & Fry, G. (2008). Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701773854
Oliver, P. (2006). Built to meet needs: Cultural issues in vernacular architecture (1st ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Built-to-Meet-Needs-Cultural-Issues-in-Vernacular-Architecture/Oliver/p/book/9780750666572
Olwig, K. R. (2019). The meanings of landscape: Essays on place, space, environment and Jus (1st ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Meanings-of-Landscape-Essays-on-Place-Space-Environment-and-Justice/Olwig/p/book/9781138483934
Overvåg, K. (2011). (PDF) Second homes: Migration or circulation? Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 65(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233018516_Second_Homes_Migration_or_Circulation
Ozili, P. K. (2022). The acceptable R-Square in empirical modelling for social science research (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4128165). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4128165
Pitkänen, K., Lehtimäki, J., & Puhakka, R. (2020). How do rural second homes affect human health and well-being? review of potential impacts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186748
Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture (1st edition). Pearson.
Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture, architecture, and design. Locke Science Publishing Co., Inc. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-e&q=Rapoport%2C+A.+%282005%29.+Culture%2C+Architecture%2C+and+Design
Relph, E. (with Internet Archive). (1976). Place and placelessness. London : Pion. http://archive.org/details/placeplacelessne0000relp
Sáenz de Tejada, C., Santo-Tomás Muro, R., & Rodríguez Romero, E. J. (2021). Exploring landscape preference through photo-based Q methodology. Madrid seen by suburban adolescents. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(2), 1–24.
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
Selman, P. (2012). Sustainable landscape planning: The reconnection Agenda. https://www.routledge.com/Sustainable-Landscape-Planning-The-Reconnection- Agenda/Selman/p/book/9781849712637
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage (1st Edition). Routledge Book. https://www.routledge.com/Uses-of-Heritage/Smith/p/book/9780415318310
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1297516
Tveit, M. S., Ode Sang, A., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248993938_Key_concepts_in_a_framework_for_analysing_visual_landscape_character
Van Den Berg, A. E., & Koole, S. L. (2006). New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006
Vellinga, M., Oliver, P., & Bridge, A. (2008). Atlas of vernacular architecture of the world (1st Edition). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Atlas-of-Vernacular-Architecture-of-the-World/Vellinga-Oliver-Bridge/p/book/9780415411516
Wartmann, F. M., Stride, C. B., Kienast, F., & Hunziker, M. (2021). Relating landscape ecological metrics with public survey data on perceived landscape quality and place attachment. Landscape Ecology, 36(8), 2367–2393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01290-y
Woods. (2010). Rural. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Rural/Woods/p/book/9780415442404
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848.