Ergonomics and Aesthetics of Seats Based on Users’ Preferences: Neuroergonomics and EEG Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture, Iran University of Science & Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Creative Design, Institute of Cognitive Sciences, Pardis, Iran.

3 Department of Industrial Design, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Abstract

Industrial designers prioritize the aesthetics of their products, drawing upon their visual training and past
experiences to align with consumer preferences and evoke specific user emotions. Ergonomists, conversely,
emphasize factors like safety, productivity, ease of use, and comfort in human-machine interactions, often sidelining
aesthetic considerations. This study explores how the appearance of office furniture influences user perceptions of
ergonomically-related comfort. We employed a method that evaluates the aesthetic indicators of Nilper chairs using brain wave mapping and measurements from an Electroencephalography (EEG) device. In a controlled lab experiment, forty participants were exposed to images of products, categorized as top sellers and low sellers. Our findings indicate that products with lower sales elicit narrower ranges of N100, N200, and P300 brain wave activity. This underscores the
impact of design aesthetics on attention and product choice. Furthermore, our results suggest the potential of neuroaesthetic evaluation methods to gauge product preference even before market release. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmed, F., & Rashid, A. (2021). Framework to select vital product design methodologies using a multicriteria decision tool for an industry segment. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 7(2),
p. 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1783945
Althuizen, N. (2021). Revisiting Berlyne’s inverted U‐shape relationship between complexity and liking:
The role of effort, arousal, and status in the appreciation of product design aesthetics. Psychology &
Marketing, 38(3), p. 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21449
Barrett, S. E., & Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain
and Cognition, 14(2), p. 201–212.
Belboula, I., Ackermann, C.-L., & Mathieu, J.-P. (2018). Product design and hierarchized persuasion
process: An application to three household electrical products. Recherche et Applications En Marketing
(English Edition), 33(4), p. 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570718787133
Benaissa, B., & Kobayashi, M. (2023). The consumers’ response to product design: a narrative review.
Ergonomics, 66(6), p. 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2127919
Berlyne, D. E. (1973). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31(4).
Bettels, J., & Wiedmann, K.-P. (2019). Brand logo symmetry and product design: The spillover effects on
consumer inferences. Journal of Business Research, 97, p. 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.039
Blackwood, D. H. R., & Muir, W. J. (1990). Cognitive brain potentials and their application. The British
Journal of Psychiatry, 157(S9), p. 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1192/S0007125000291897
Boucha, D., Amiri, A., & Chogueur, D. (2017). Controlling electronic devices remotely by voice and brain
waves. 2017 International Conference on Mathematics and Information Technology (ICMIT), p. 38–42.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MATHIT.2017.8259693
Buker, T., Schmitt, T., Miehling, J., & Wartzack, S. (2022). What’s more important for product design–
usability or emotionality? An examination of influencing factors. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(8–9),
p. 635–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2142902
Chew, L. H., Teo, J., & Mountstephens, J. (2016). Aesthetic preference recognition of 3D shapes using
EEG. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 10, p. 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-015-9363-z
Correll, J., Urland, G. R., & Ito, T. A. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role
of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), p. 120–128.
de Tommaso, M., Pecoraro, C., Sardaro, M., Serpino, C., Lancioni, G., & Livrea, P. (2008). Influence of
aesthetic perception on visual event-related potentials. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), p. 933–945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.09.003
Diefenbach, S., & Hassenzahl, M. (2011). The dilemma of the hedonic–Appreciated, but hard to justify.
Interacting with Computers, 23(5), p. 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.002
Ding, Y., Guo, F., Hu, M., & Cao, Y. (2017). Using event related potentials to investigate visual aesthetic
perception of product appearance. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries,
27(5), p. 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20704
Eilouti, B. (2023). A framework for integrating ergonomics into architectural design. Ergonomics in
Design, 31(1), p. 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804620983672
Fouad, I. A. (2021). A robust and reliable online P300-based BCI system using Emotiv EPOC+ headset.
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 45(2), p. 94–114.
Gilal, N. G., Zhang, J., & Gilal, F. G. (2018). The four-factor model of product design: Scale development
and validation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(6), p. 684–700.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2017-1659
Guo, F., Ding, Y., Wang, T., Liu, W., & Jin, H. (2016). Applying event related potentials to evaluate user
preferences toward smartphone form design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 54, p. 57–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.04.006
Guo, F., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Ding, Y. (2018). Affective preference measurement of product appearance
based on event-related potentials. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20, p. 299–308.
Handy, T. C., Smilek, D., Geiger, L., Liu, C., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). ERP evidence for rapid hedonic
evaluation of logos. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), p. 124–138.
Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (2003). ‘Most advanced, yet acceptable’: Typicality
and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology,
94(1), p. 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842147
Hemonnet-Goujot, A., & Valette-Florence, P. (2022). “All you need is love” from product design value
perception to luxury brand love: An integrated framework. Journal of Business Research, 139, p. 1463–
1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.066
Hou, G., & Lu, G. (2018). Semantic processing and emotional evaluation in the traffic sign understanding
process: evidence from an event-related potential study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic
Psychology and Behaviour, 59, p. 236–243.
Honglun, H., Shouqian, S., & Yunhe, P. (2007). Research on virtual human in ergonomic simulation.
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(2), p. 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.06.027
Jeang, A., Chiang, A. J., Chiang, P. C., Chiang, P. S., & Tung, P. Y. (2018). Robust parameters
determination for ergonomical product design via computer musculoskeletal modeling and multi-objective
optimization. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 118, p. 180–201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.013
Jiao-Jiao, W., Can-Qun, H., & Wen-Jing, X. (2014). Discussion on the coordination of aesthetics and
ergonomics based on the self-express in product design. 2014 International Conference on Economic
Management and Trade Cooperation (EMTC 2014), p. 46–52.
Ju, X., Li, M., Tian, W., & Hu, D. (2023). EEG-based emotion recognition using a temporal-difference
minimizing neural network. Cognitive Neurodynamics, p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-
10004-w
Kortum, P. (2024). When human factors fail: Intentional and unintentional bad designs. Ergonomics in
Design, 32(1), p. 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211033901
Kuber, P. M., & Rashedi, E. (2023). Designing a new forklift backrest: Role of adjustability in improving
operator comfort. Ergonomics in Design, 31(4), p. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211002378
Kuo, C.-F., & Chu, C.-H. (2005). An online ergonomic evaluator for 3D product design. Computers in
Industry, 56(5), p. 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.02.002
Li, R., Qin, R., Zhang, J., Wu, J., & Zhou, C. (2015). The esthetic preference of Chinese typefaces–An
event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1598, p. 57–65.
Liberman-Pincu, E., & Bitan, Y. (2021). FULE—Functionality, usability, look-and-feel and evaluation
novel user-centered product design methodology—Illustrated in the case of an autonomous medical device.
Applied Sciences, 11(3), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11030985
Liu, Y. (2003). Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dualprocess research methodology. Ergonomics, 46(13–14), p. 1273–1292.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130310001610829
Lu, P., & Hsiao, S.-W. (2022). A product design method for form and color matching based on aesthetic
theory. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53, 101702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101702
Ma, Q., Hu, L., & Wang, X. (2015). Emotion and novelty processing in an implicit aesthetic experience of
architectures: evidence from an event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 26(5), p. 279–284.
MahdiNejad, J.-D., Azemati, H., Sadeghi Habibabad, A., & Matracchi, P. (2021). Investigating the effect
of age and gender of users on improving spirituality by using EEG. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 15, p. 637–
647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-020-09654-x
Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Barrera-Causil, C., Kuang, S., Fazlali, Z., Wegener, D., Kneib, T., De Bastiani, F.,
& Martinez-Florez, G. (2023). Generalised exponential-Gaussian distribution: A method for neural
reaction time analysis. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 17(1), p. 221–237.
Martín-Chinea, K., Ortega, J., Gómez-González, J. F., Pereda, E., Toledo, J., & Acosta, L. (2023). Effect
of time windows in LSTM networks for EEG-based BCIs. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 17(2), p. 385–398.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-022-09832-z
Mizokuchi, K., Tanaka, T., Sato, T. G., & Shiraki, Y. (2023). Alpha band modulation caused by selective
attention to music enables EEG classification. Cognitive Neurodynamics, p. 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-09955-x
Mumcu, Y., & Kimzan, H. S. (2015). The effect of visual product aesthetics on consumers’ price sensitivity.
Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, p. 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00883-7
Naeini Sadeghi, H., Conti, G. M., Motta, M., Karuppiah, K., Mamaghani, N. K., & Jafarnejad, M. (2023).
Sustainable workplace: An integrated approach to industrial ergonomics and service design. Rivista
Italiana Di Ergonomia, 25, p. 13–27.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Civitas Books.
Orth, U. R., & De Marchi, R. (2007). Understanding the relationships between functional, symbolic, and
experiential brand beliefs, product experiential attributes, and product schema: advertising-trial
interactions revisited. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(3), p. 219–233.
https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150303
Paradiso, S., Johnson, D. L., Andreasen, N. C., O’Leary, D. S., Watkins, G. L., Boles Ponto, L. L., &
Hichwa, R. D. (1999). Cerebral blood flow changes associated with attribution of emotional valence to
pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral visual stimuli in a PET study of normal subjects. American Journal of
Psychiatry, 156(10), p. 1618–1629. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.10.1618
Pleyers, G. (2021). Shape congruence in product design: Impacts on automatically activated attitudes.
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101935
Rabinovich, M., Bick, C., & Varona, P. (2023). Beyond neurons and spikes: cognon, the hierarchical
dynamical unit of thought. Cognitive Neurodynamics, p. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-09987-3
Righi, S., Orlando, V., & Marzi, T. (2014). Attractiveness and affordance shape tools neural coding: insight
from ERPs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(3), p. 240–253.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.01.003
Sabir, S. S. (2020). Does product design stimulate customer satisfaction? Mediating role of affect. Asia
Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(6), p. 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-
0216
Sadeghi Naeini, H., Jafarnejad Shahri, M., Koleini Mamghani, N., & Karmegam, K. (2023). WorkSatisfaction throughout Workplace design: An approach on Ergonomics and Hedonomics for Office Design.
Journal of Design Thinking.
Sagot, J.-C., Gouin, V., & Gomes, S. (2003). Ergonomics in product design: Safety factor. Safety Science,
41(2–3), p. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00038-3
Saleh, B., Rasul, M. S., & Affandi, H. M. (2019). A content analysis on quality for CAD based product
design: Developing a framework for malaysian technical teacher training institute. Journal of Technical
Education and Training, 11(2).
Sameti, A., Koslow, S., & Mashhady, A. (2022). Are product design researchers and practitioners on the
same page? The way professional product designers view creative design. Journal of Product & Brand
Management, 31(6), p. 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2021-3560
Sun, X., Houssin, R., Renaud, J., & Gardoni, M. (2018). Towards a human factors and ergonomics
integration framework in the early product design phase: Function-Task-Behaviour. International Journal
of Production Research, 56(14), p. 4941–4953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1437287
Suri, J. F., & Marsh, M. (2000). Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design.
Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), p. 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00035-6
Ursino, M., Cesaretti, N., & Pirazzini, G. (2023). A model of working memory for encoding multiple items
and ordered sequences exploiting the theta-gamma code. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 17(2), p. 489–521.
Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.
Psychophysiology, 37(2), p. 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720190
Wan, Q., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Song, S., & Ke, Q. (2021). Visual perception of different wood surfaces: An
event-related potentials study. Annals of Forest Science, 78, p. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-
01026-7
Wang, X. (2022). Research on home product design and intelligent algorithm recommendation considering
ergonomics. Journal of Sensors. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1791269
Wang, Y. J., & Minor, M. S. (2008). Validity, reliability, and applicability of psychophysiological
techniques in marketing research. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), p. 197–232.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20206
Wu, J., Xing, B., Si, H., Dou, J., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., & Liu, X. (2020). Product design award prediction
modeling: Design visual aesthetic quality assessment via DCNNs. IEEE Access, 8, p. 211028–211047.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039715
Xu, W. (2014). Enhanced ergonomics approaches for product design: a user experience ecosystem
perspective and case studies. Ergonomics, 57(1), p. 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.861023
Zeki, S. (2001). Artistic creativity and the brain. Science, 293(5527), p. 51–52.
https://doi.org/1126/science.1062331
Zhang, F., Yang, M., & Liu, W. (2014). Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of
innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design. Computers & Industrial Engineering,
76, p. 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.019