Assessment of Empathy in Design Thinking Model: A Case Study of Ghanaian Design Company

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Sunyani Technical University, Sunyani, Ghana

2 Department of Industrial Art, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

3 Department of Fine Arts, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Abstract

Design thinking recently has become the model employed in solving difficulties and to improve product and services in design companies. It is known to be user-centric or human-centric which explains how empathetic it is in its design approach. However, it has been observed that even though design thinking is practiced by Ghanaian design industries, the exploit of empathy is not reflective in various deign companies in Ghana, hence a case study to investigate how design companies empathise in their design thinking processes. As a qualitative study, a case and participatory research methods were employed using unstructured interview and participant observation as data collection methods. From the study, it was revealed that 4Heem Apparel similarly practice traditional classic design model where empathy is employed at initial stages of design thinking. Even though it does not affect the quality of design, it sidelines the interest of clients and their involvement in product quality hence affecting its innovative product design. It was therefore suggested that; Ghanaian design companies can be more innovative if they will empathise more with their clients in their design thinking processes.

Keywords

References

Abraham, I., Howard, E., & Asinyo, B. (2022). Design thinking in design innovation among Small and medium textile enterprises in Ghana. Journal of Design Thinking. 3(1), p. 49-60. DOI: 10.22059/jdt.2022.344139.1078
Bahirat, T. (2022). What is empathy in design thinking? Why is it important? Available at: https://www.mygreatlearning.com/blog/what-is-empathy-in-design-thinking/#Empathize%20Methods (Accessed: September 22, 2023).
Bhandari, P. (2023). What is qualitative research? Methods and examples. Available at: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/ (Accessed: August 5, 2023).
Carmel–Gilfilen, C., & Portillo, M. (2016). Designing with empathy. Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 9, p. 130 - 146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715592633
Chang-Arana, Á., Surma-aho, A., Hölttä-Otto, K., & Sams, M. (2022). Under the umbrella: Components of empathy in psychology and design. Design Science. 8. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.13
Cherry, K. (2023). What is empathy? Available at: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-empathy-2795562 (Accessed: September 24, 2023).
Connor, P. K. (2019). Design Thinking (Driving Transformation). Available at: https://habib.edu.pk/docs/nso2020/Desig-Thinking-Driving-Transformation.pdf (Accessed: August 11, 2023).
Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative inquiry. 9(3), p. 335-354.
Dam, R.F., & Siang, T. Y. (2020). What is empathy and why is it so important in design thinking? Available at: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-getting-started-with-empathy (Accessed: September 24, 2023).
De Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. Research Design in Social Research. p. 1-296.
Deitte, L., & Omary, R. (2019). The power of design thinking in medical education. Academic radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.02.012
Dijakovic, K. (2023). The practical value of design thinking. Available at: https://inchoo.net/ux-ui-design/practical-value-of-design-thinking/ (Accessed: August 16, 2023).
George, T. (2023). What is participant observation? (Definition and Examples). Available at: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/participant-observation/#:~:text=Participant%20observation%20is%20a%20type%20of%20qualitative%20research%20method.,a%20longer%20period%20of%20time (Accessed: July 28, 2023).
Gray, D. E. (2021). Doing research in the real world. Doing research in the real world. p. 1-100.
Haag, M., & Marsden, N. (2019). Exploring personas as a method to foster empathy in student IT design teams. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 29, p. 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-018-9452-5
Heylighen, A., & Dong, A. (2019). To empathise or not to empathise? Empathy and its limits in design. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.007
Hirsch, E. M. (2007). The role of empathy in medicine: A medical student’s perspective. Available at https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/role-empathy-medicine-medical-students-perspective/2007-06 (Accessed: September 23, 2023).
Ho, D., Ma, J., & Lee, Y. (2011). Empathy and design research: A phenomenological study on young people experiencing participatory design for social inclusion. Codesign. 7, p. 106 - 95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609893
Holt, M. (2011). The limits of empathy: Utopianism, absorption and theatricality in design. The Design Journal. 14, p. 151 - 164. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611X12984592779926
Kaluza, J. (2023). Using narrative analysis in qualitative research. Available at: https://dovetail.com/research/narrative-analysis/#:~:text=Narrative%20analysis%20is%20a%20type,how%20the%20individuals%20experienced%20something (Accessed: July 30, 2023).
Kanagat, N., & LaFond, A. (2023). The use of design thinking in MNCH programs: A case study of the community benefits health (CBH) pilot, Ghana. Available at: https://www.comminit.com/early-child/content/use-design-thinking-mnch-programs-case-study-community-benefits-health-cbh-pilot-ghana (Accessed: July 29, 2023).
Lewis, M., Hayward, S., & Hornyák, R. (2017). Design thinking: Breaking fixation for new relationships between organizations. Journal of Business Strategy. 38, p. 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-07-2016-0074
Marful, A. B., Danquah, J. A., Ansah, M., Ben-Smith, P., & Duah, D. (2021). Design thinking as an effective tool for architectural pedagogy: Challenges and benefits for Ghanaian schools. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2022.2051828 (Accessed: July 23, 2023).
Mazhar, S. A., Anjum R., Anwar A. I., & Khan A. A. (2021). Methods of data collection: A fundamental tool of research. Integrated Community Health Journal. 10(1), p. 6-10. Available at: http://medicaljournalshouse.com/index.php/ADR-CommunityHealth/article/view/631 (Accessed: August 11, 2023).
Musante, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. AltaMira Press. https://books.google.com.gh/books?id=ymJJUkR7s3UC
Okai-Mensah, C. K., Howard, E. K., & Osei, M. A. (2021). Implementation of design thinking and innovation by Ghanaian companies: A case of CPC. Available at: http://atuspace.atu.edu.gh/handle/123456789/2659 (Accessed: August 1, 2023).
Okyere, S. A., & Diko, S. K. (2022). Ghana’s informal residents show how social innovation can solve urban challenges. Available at: https://theconversation.com/ghanas-informal-residents-show-how-social-innovation-can-solve-urban-challenges-194092 (Accessed: August 2, 2023).
Pedamkar, P. (2023). What is qualitative data analysis. Available at: https://www.educba.com/what-is-qualitative-data-analysis/ (Accessed: August 11, 2023).
Prinz, J. (2011). Against Empathy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 49(1), p. 214–233.
Qamar, A. H. (2023). Data Collection: Unstructured interviews – A conversational iceberg. Available at https://www.methodspace.com/blog/unstructured-interviews-a-conversational-iceberg (Accessed: August 2, 2023).
Raju, K. S. (2022). What is design thinking and why is it important? Available at https://www.mygreatlearning.com/blog/importance-of-design-thinking/ (Accessed July 10, 2023).
Rijn, H., Visser, F., Stappers, P., & Özakar, A. (2011). Achieving empathy with users: the effects of different sources of information. Codesign. 7, p. 65 - 77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609889
Seifert, A., Hofer, M., & Allemand, M. (2018). Mobile data collection: Smart, but not (yet) smart enough. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00971\
Sekyi, L. K. (2020). Design thinking offers better solution to Africa’s problem – Dr adomdza. Available at: https://www.modernghana.com/news/988167/design-thinking-offers-better-solutions-to-africa.html (Accessed: June 28, 2023).
Shé, C., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., & Costello, E. (2021). Integrating design thinking into instructional design: The #OpenTeach case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6667
Smeenk, W., Sturm, J., & Eggen, B. (2019). A comparison of existing frameworks leading to an empathic formation compass for co-design. International Journal of Design. 13, p. 53-68.
Spencer, B. (2022). What is human-centered design? 3 Phases, 4 Principles, and a Call-to-Action. Available at: https://www.freshconsulting.com/insights/blog/human-centered-design/ (Accessed: September 22, 2023).
Stevens, E. (2021). What is empathy in design thinking? A comprehensive guide. Available at: https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/what-is-empathy-in-design-thinking/#where-does-empathy-fit-into-the-design-thinking-process (Accessed: September 24, 2023).
Surma-aho, A., Björklund, T., & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2018). Assessing the development of empathy and innovation attitudes in a project-based engineering design course. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29826
Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory research methods – choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods. 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244 (Accessed: July 31, 2023)
Voeten, J. (2016). Enabling innovation and productivity growth in manufacturing small and medium sized enterprises in low income countries. (Qualitative Exploration of Policy and Research in Ghana) Available at:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a0895640f0b652dd00019a/61056_Ghana_Qualitative_Exploration_Research_and_Policy_issues.pdf (Accessed: June 18, 2023).
Woodcock, A., McDonagh, D., Osmond, J., & Wesley, S. (2017). Empathy, Design and Human Factors. p. 569-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_54
Wyman, G., Holland, V., & Yates, S. (2012). Conversations with the Marketplace: An application of Design Thinking and Sociodrama Action Methods in an Innovation Workshop. International Journal of Innovation Science. 4, p. 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.4.2.77
This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditios of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license.
Journal of Design Thinking
Volume 3, Issue 2
December 2022
Pages 291-302

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics