A Framework for Leveraging the Capacities of Digital Technology to Improve the Quality of Life of Older Adults in Urban Public Space Design, Case Study: Zand Street, Shiraz, Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Urbanism., Tourism, Architecture and Urban Research Center, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Urban Planning, Art & Architecture Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The current research was conducted with the aim of explaining and presenting a framework for utilizing the capacities of digital technology to improve the quality of the elderly’s presence in urban public spaces, focusing on Zand Street in Shiraz through a mixed and analytical approach. This study identifies and prioritizes components enhancing the elderly’s presence while analyzing the spatial and functional characteristics of the environment. First, documentary studies and literature reviews were used to extract indicators affecting the quality of elderly presence across physical, social, technological, functional, natural, and managerial dimensions. To understand actual conditions, field analyses including direct observation and environmental surveys of Zand Street were conducted. This stage identified behavioral patterns, spatial strengths/weaknesses, and user interactions with environmental elements and existing technologies. Subsequently, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) measured the relative importance of indicators and analyzed their interrelationships. Data were collected through purposive questionnaires from elderly users with continuous experience in the studied space. Finally, ANP results and field findings were integrated to provide a practical framework for age-friendly public spaces emphasizing real environmental characteristics and user experience. Findings showed that while physical and social dimensions are foundational for active presence, digital technology acts as a facilitating factor. Results also indicated that a safe and accessible environment is a prerequisite for effective technology use and social interaction, while smart urban management can improve the effectiveness of other indicators. This research provides an integrated analytical framework combining spatial design and digital technology, serving as a practical guide for the design and management of age-friendly public spaces.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ahari, M., & Maqami, H. R. (2021). The impact of digital educational technology on the quality of life of elderly women in Karaj City [In Persian]. Clinical Psychology & Personality (Daneshvar Raftar), 19(1), 57–65. https://sid.ir/paper/1044808/fa
Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
Bastardo, R., Pavão, J., & Rocha, N. (2022). A survey on smart cities and ageing. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on ICT for Ageing Well & e-Health (ICT4AWE 2022) (pp. 330–337). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0011113500003188
Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, f., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Beard, J. R., Officer, A., de Carvalho, I. A., Sadana, R., Pot, A. M., Michel, J. P., & Chatterji, S. (2016). The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. The Lancet, 387(10033), 2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
Buffel, T., Handler, S., & Phillipson, C. (Eds.). (2018). Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447331322
Chen, Y., Hicks, A., While, A. E. (2013). Loneliness and social support of older people in China: a systematic literature review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12051
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
Giovanna D Roza, J., Wei Liang Ng, D., Wang, Ch., Seok Chin Soh, C., Jia Goh, L., Koottappal, B. Jose, T., Yan Tan, Ch., Cheng Goh, K. (2022). Impact of perceived safety and barriers on physical activity levels in Community-Dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore: A Cross-Sectional mixed methods study.  Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 31(1), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2021-0184
Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2025). Age sustainability in smart cities: Seniors as urban stakeholders. Sustainability, 17(14), 6333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146333
Kawaguchi, K., et al. (2024). Effects of a mobile app to promote social participation on community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/64196
Kim, H. S., Kim, J. S., Lee, K. Y. (2022). The effect of digital literacy in the elderly on life satisfaction: Focusing on depression and social participation. Geron technology, 21(s),1-1 https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2022.21.s.712.pp1
Lak, A., Baradaran, H. R., Aghamolaei, R., & Myint, P. K. (2020). Elder-friendly public open spaces: A framework for evaluation and recommendations. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 56, 126857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126857
Li, M., Zhao, J., & Wang, X. (2021). Smart city and ageing: Technology, inclusion, and equity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 12817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412817
Liu, J. (2025). Systematic review of smart elderly care in digital environments and its impact on quality of life. Sustainability, 17(24), 11357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411357
Neves, B. B., & Amaro, F. (2012). Too old for technology? How the elderly of Lisbon use and perceive ICT? The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v8i1.3060
Peek, S. T. M., et al. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for ageing in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0
Pourjafar, M. R., Taghvaee, A. A., Bemanian, M. R., Sadeghi, A. R., & Ahmadi, F. (2010). Effective environmental aspects of public spaces formation to achieve successful aging with emphasis on elderly preferences of Shiraz. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing, 5 (1). 22-34. http://salmandj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-291-fa.html
Von Faber, M., van der Pas, S., & Tavy, Z. (2020). Engaging older people in age-friendly cities through participatory video design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8977. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238977
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Decade of healthy ageing: Baseline report. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017900
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Global report on ageism. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240016866
Younes, S. R., Marques, B., & McIntosh, J. (2024). Public spaces for older people: A review of the relationship between public space and quality of life. Sustainability, 16(11), 45-83. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114583 
Journal of Design Thinking
Volume 6, Issue 2
December 2025
Pages 351-363

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics